Banks – Banking n Finance » 2009 » August

China’s Jiangsu Jiangyin Agricultural Commercial Bank plans to raise several bn. yuan in a preliminary public offering in Shanghai next year to pay for enlargement, 2 folk with direct understanding of the plan declared on Tues. .  Jiangyin Bank, based in eastern China’s Jiangsu province, submitted an IPO application late last year and is waiting for regulatory permission.

Jiangyin Bank is struggling with Shanghai Rustic Commercial Bank, in some measure owned by Australia & New Zealand Banking Group ( ANZ.AX ), to become China’s first listed rustic bank. Foreign banks including HSBC Holdings Plc ( HSBA.L ), Citigroup Inc ( C.N ) and Standard Chartered Bank ( STAN.L ) have set up agricultural money establishments in China as the governing body encourages agricultural financing to help farmers and home businesses.

“In places like Jiangyin the rustic economy is colourful, with many home businesses that are growing rapidly,” claimed Liu June , an analyst at Changjiang Stocks Corp “Rural banks have the potential to compete immediately with town banks as they grow bigger.” Going public could also help Jiangyin Bank to grow thru acquisitions.

The bank last year acquired a 10 % percentage in Jinjiang Rustic Cooperative , and owns a controlling percentage in 2 agricultural banks in western China’s Sichuan province. Jiangyin Bank was formed in 2001 as a part of China’s money reforms in the country targeted at narrowing the wealth opening between urban and rustic areas.

The bank, with thirty branches and 67 smaller outlets, extends loans principally to home businesses and hi-tech firms, according to its internet site. Jiangyin Bank’s net profit went up 20 % in 2008 to 598 million yuan ( $87 million ) on cash that increased 39 percent to 1.36 bn. yuan, as the world industrial slowdown created issues for the various exporters among its clients and its margins shrank. The bank had total assets of 32 bill yuan at the end of last year.

More than 150 in public traded US banks own nonperforming loans that equal five p.c or more of their holdings, a level that previous regulators say can wipe out a bank’s equity and threaten its survival.

And Bloomberg seems to have recognized the key issue with these banks ( all of which should have been shut over twelve months gone. Excluding the stress-test list, banks with nonperformers above five % had mixed deposits of $193 bn., according to Bloomberg information. That is just about 15 times the scale of the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund at the end of the first quarter.

But the genuine problem is regulatory malfeasance. See, the point of the Tier Capital Proportion is to let the governing body ( FDIC ) to come in thru the OTS or OCC before the regulatory capital cushion is wholly used, and if the law is basically followed and folks actually do their roles, there’s no loss to the repository insurance fund.

That is, while a bank’s assets can be sold ( in total ) for at least its liabilities ( deposits ) there’s no loss. The bank may go busy from a perspective of being a “going concern” but there’s no hit to the taxpayer, no hit to the repository fund and no problem ( aside from for the stockholders of the bank concerned).

But when you permit banks to lie for 2 years for the explicit purpose of “trying to earn their way thru the cycle” you hitch your discussion to the view the real issue is one of client confidence, not OTT debt and loose lending.

Only a fool would have disagreed that given what we all know of the lending environment from 2003-2007, yet that’s precisely the debate that Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner, Bair and others have made thru this entire mess. President Obama should have closed all banks for a week when he first took office, sent in the examiners, and allowed those with non-performing loan bases of 2% or less to re-open.

He should have set out a 2% non-accrual standard and stuck by it – hit that, you’re closed. But that would have run dimensionally in contrast to the perspective that we must “enhance lending” to get out of this recession – a foolhardy point of view when the rationale you’re in recession in the 1st place is that too many folks made too many loans to too many people who had no cash to pay them back.

Now we’re stuck – we seem to have “avoided” a Depression, but we have in truth done no such thing. We have instead played “extend and pretend” writ massive on the taxpayer’s back, and yet the default rate continues to explode higher as we refused to coerce these establishments to disgorge their bad assets.

In fact the roots of this problem lies with loose ( or absent ) regulation over the last 10 years in the banking sector, where “fog a mirror” loans were available for just about any reason. As a result of our government’s refusal to face this problem head-on in 2007 and 2008 ( notwithstanding many looking for it, myself included ) we are far away from the end of this crisis, despite rallies in the exchange.

Indeed, I remain certain that recognition of fact will come fast and hard in the next year or thereabouts as these “not too large to fail” firms blow up one at a time, causing regulators to come in and close them, and ultimately, asset valuations are forced down to a realm that comports with fact.

In the sector’s latest shift away from debatable forced settlement clauses, Bank of America related Thu. that it will not need Mastercard, deposit account and vehicle loan purchasers to sign away their right to sue. The change comes as imperative settlement clauses found in credit card, phone and, increasingly, job contracts drawn criticism from regulators and Congress. Last month, Minnesota lawyer General Lori Swanson sued a major dispute-resolution firm, State settlement Forum, charging that it hid its ties to the debt-collection industry.

Since then, a rising number of dispute-resolution firms and Visa card corporations have backed away from settlement. Chase last month stated that it would no longer file new settlement claims on consumer card disputes. BofA’s move is wider as it will not need imperative settlement for banking and loan customers. That suggests clients can now sue the bank instead of having the argument handled by a previous judge or legal expert behind closed doors.

“This is a significant victory for consumers,” claims Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director at the US Public Interest Research Group. “If banks know they will not be protected by settlement, it’ll lead to fairer ( product ) terms. Some banks may review their use of settlement to struggle against their peers, claims Scott Talbott, senior vice chairman of the Finance Services Roundtable, which represents large banks. Voters Bank now explains it’s reviewing imperative arbitration clauses in Mastercard contracts.

In the meantime , Amex is “reassessing” its options related to settlement forums, announces spokesman Joanna Lambert.

While the industry still believes settlement is a fair process, Talbott claims, it has unfairly “become a lightning rod” for feedback. BofA explains it made a decision to ax settlement in part because of consumer grumbles. Even though it no longer needs settlement for new disputes, it’ll establish whether individual existing disputes can go to law. Eric Gertz, 39, who has a settlement hearing prepared in Sep against BofA related to $18,000 in disputed charges, claims it might be “unfair” if he could not sue the bank since other customers now can. Michael LeRoy, a law lecturer at the University of Illinois, announces while he understands consumers’ relief to have an option besides arbitration, they shouldn’t expect the “delayed and over-taxed” court system to be a cure-all.

The US Justice Dept and Swiss banking giant UBS have reached an agreement on the IRS’s demands for the names of an approximate 52,000 rich Yankee bank clients suspected of tax evasion, both sides told a federal judge Wednesday.  “The parties have initialed agreements,” Stuart Gibson, a Justice Dept tax division solicitor, told US District Judge Alan Gold during a morning telephone meeting.

“It will take a bit of time for the agreements to be signed in last form and when the final documents are signed, the parties will file a stipulation” to dismiss the case against UBS. Neither Gibson nor lawyers for UBS provided details on the deal, which settles the closely studied case which has promised to add new cracks to Switzerland’s historical name for banking privacy. IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman claimed the contract “protects the US central authority’s interests” and that details would be released “when the Swiss presidency signs the contract, as early as next week.”. UBS Boss man Kaspar Villiger declared bank officers “are thankful the 2 executives reached this agreement to decide this issue.” He also thanked the Swiss presidency and its members concerned in negotiating the deal. William Pointy , a Florida tax barrister who represents Yank UBS clients, stated that he expects the accord to permit Swiss authorities to translate bank privacy laws more broadly and permit a “substantial handover” of names.

“I would guess the US wouldn’t enter into this agreement lacking the presence of a major fine and penalty without having at least many hundred or maybe even thousands of names turned over,” Pointy said. And IRS contentions that UBS must give the money info as the clients in query have dodged millions of greenbacks in US taxes with secret help from the bank. UBS in Feb agreed to pay $780 million in a settlement that deferred prosecution of charges that it had regularly sent financiers on surreptitious journeys to the US to help Yankee patrons hide assets in offshore accounts that wouldn’t be reported to the IRS. UBS has disagreed that divulging the customer list would amount to a criminal violation of Swiss banking privacy laws.

The Swiss presidency has raised the likelihood that it might seize customer info to forestall any handover ordered by a US court. On Mon. , the Swiss Federal Council’s 7 members returned early from a booked holiday for a special meeting to debate the legal deadlock. So far, 3 of those clients have confessed to filing fake tax returns. The IRS in March launched a six-month program offering lower penalties to US people who willingly divulge secret offshore assets and agree to repay taxes.

Collusion often means no legal charges will be filed, and needs payment of back taxes and interest for no less than six years, and some penalties. While the IRS has not divulged the collusion rate, the agency asserts there was a dramatic rise in the amount of taxpayers making voluntary disclosures this year. Almost all of the cases involve taxpayers with unreported income in offshore accounts, the IRS says.

In spite of signs the money system has stabilised, banks remain threatened by billions of dollars of bad loans on their balance sheets, and more could fail if the economy gets worse, a congressional watchdog panel says.  10 months into the federal rescue program, the uneasy assets “remain a significant danger to the monetary system,” the report says. “Financial stability stays at risk if the root of the problem of poisonous assets remains unresolved.  In its latest evaluation of the $700 bln financial system rescue, the Congressional Oversight Panel ( COP ) cautions that banks still hold many dangerous loans of uncertain value. If unemployment rises sharply or the commercial real estate market falls down as many financial consultants fear the banking system could again lose its footing, the panel announces in a dispatch to be released Tues. .

“The finance system ( remains ) exposed to the emergency conditions that ( the rescue ) was intended to fix,” the panel wrote in a draft copy of Tues.’s report. The Congressional Oversight Panel was made as a part of the Uneasy Asset Relief Program, or TARP. It is meant to supply an extra layer of oversight, outside the Special Inspector General for the TARP and regular audits by the Government Accountability Office.  The report asserts lots of the Obama administration’s money stability efforts are working including infusions of capital for banks, heightened scrutiny of capital proportions, “stress-testing” of large monetary firms.

It also points towards a public-private investment plan designed to purchase bad assets that still has to get off the ground. But with banks still holding the assets at the guts of the emergency, they remain exposed, the panel says. “These steps have authorized the banks to take major losses while building reserves,” the panel wrote in the draft report. “Nonetheless, fiscal stability stays at risk if the real problem of poisonous assets remains unresolved.

Little banks are particularly exposed, the report says. The troubled assets weighing on their balance sheets sometimes are in the shape of complete loans, as against the mortgage-backed stocks formed from bundles of numerous loans. The Treasury Dept’s main program for grabbing bad assets now targets those instruments and not supposed “whole” loans. Additionally, the report announces, regional and smaller banks hold larger numbers of commercial real estate loans, “which pose a potential threat of high defaults.” it announced the adequacy of small banks’ capital cushions against losses has not been graded by the governing body, which performed “stress tests” in May only on the 19 largest US banks including Bank of America, Capital One Fiscal , Citigroup, GMAC, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.

Owners of shopping malls, hostels and offices have been defaulting on their loans at a worrying rate, and the commercial real estate market isn’t predicted to hit bottom for 3 more years, industry leaders have claimed. Delinquency rates on commercial loans have doubled the year just gone to 7% as more corporations downsize and outlets close, according to the Federal Reserve. The commercial real estate market’s fortunes are tied closely to the economy, particularly unemployment, which registered 9.4% last month.

As folks get made redundant, or have their hours reduced, they cut spending, which wounds outlets, and they take less trips, influencing hostels and other travel-related businesses. The oversight panel has issued a chain of reports on the governing body’s monetary rescue programs, raising questions about their management and oversight. It is lead by Harvard Law Faculty professor Elizabeth Warren. The other members are Republican Rep Jeb Hensarling ; Richard Neiman, super of banks at the Big Apple State Banking Dep. ; Damon Silvers, associate advocate at the AFL-CIO ; and previous Republican Sen John Sununu of New Hampshire. The new report was adopted by the panel 4-1 Monday with Hensarling voting against it.

The New York-based bank claimed it has licensed $50.8 bill in lending programs tied to receiving cash as an element of the Uneasy Asset Relief Program, or TARP. The program was launched last autumn by the Treasury Department to help stabilise the lending markets at the top of the credit crunch. A part of that cash was latterly converted into a 34% possession stake for the govt. Among the money authorized for lending, $15.1 bn. has been utilized, the banking giant declared in its 3rd quarterly update on how it is expanding lending efforts after receiving central authority money.

2 new programs, worth up to $6 bln, were authorized by Citi in quarter two. Citigroup will supply up to $4 bn. in borough letters of credit and another $2 bln for mortgage originators. The lending initiative for municipalities builds on a $5 bn. program Citi licensed in Q1 that provides loans to civil clients to immediately fund capital projects , for example building new infrastructure. The letters of credit should be available to local central authorities, community agencies, medicare groups and other public finance clients for at least 3 years.

The $2 bln for mortgage originators should be available as loans known as warehouse credit lines. Mortgage banks will tap the credit lines to originate new mortgages. When the new mortgages are then sold in the secondary markets, the cash is paid back on the line of credit. It then becomes available again to scribble new loans. A majority of Citigroup’s lending initiatives since receiving TARP funds have been aimed toward the mortgage market, which started to collapse in 2007 and helped push the country into recession. Mounting loan losses on failed mortgages and the declining price of investments tied to the real estate loans have been the first drivers of losses at banks and other financial establishments. Over fifty percent the money Citi has employed so far has been used to buy bonds backed by mortgages in the secondary market. Banks like Citigroup don’t lend the TARP cash immediately to borrowers.

Instead, the banks keep the additional capital on their books, which lets them borrow extra cash from funding sources. Then, they lend that borrowed cash to others. A bank earns money by borrowing cheaply for the short term and lending at raised rates for the long term ; if a bank has no capital, other establishments and financiers will not lend to it. Since Citigroup received a preliminary $25 billion in October, it has made $330 bln in new credit available to US consumers, small business and communities, including $129.7 bn. in quarter 2.

A Federal  judge has declined to approve a suggested settlement between the SEC Commission and Bank of America over the payment of bonuses to Merrill Lynch middle management, exclaiming he wasn’t able to establish if it was fair to the general public. The largest US bank concluded August three to pay $33 million to decide an SEC civil legal action accusing it of tricking stockholders by not divulging it had permitted the payment of almost $5.8 bn. of bonuses to Merrill staff. RELATED : B. O. A still fighting in USA during Second-quarter . But at a hearing Mon. , Judge Jed Rakoff of the Fed. court in Manhattan said he requires a “much more detailed account of the underlying facts” before signing off on the settlement. “I would be less than candid if I did not express my continued misgivings about this settlement at this stage,” Rakoff claimed. He announced the settlement “seems to be low in transparency.

Noting the government had pumped $45 bn. of taxpayer cash into Bank of America from the Fed bank rescue plan, the Uneasy Asset Relief Program, Rakoff further said he couldn’t reconcile the SEC’s position the bank “effectively lied” to investors, with the regulator’s call not to persuade the bank to confess evil-doing.  Given the bailout cash awarded to BOA, including $20 bn. used to help absorb Merrill, Rakoff declared that “one might infer that public money was employed, in reality to pay the bonuses. “Don’t I must know what the truth is before I could make a backbone here?” Rakoff announced.  “Is there not something bizarrely contorted in a fine of $33 million?”.

The judge directed both sides to make new submissions on August twenty-four and Sept.  According to the SEC complaint, BOA told stockholders in stand in documents that Merrill accepted not to award bonuses or inducement pay before the coalition closed, when actually the bank had sanctioned Merrill to pay bonuses. Rakoff appeared doubtful that Kenneth Lewis and John Thain, the chief managers of B. O. An and Merrill, shouldn’t be held to account for the choice not to reveal the bonuses to investors before they voted on the alliance. Maureen Lewis, an SEC barrister, responded that Lewis and Thain “relied on the lawyers’ recommendation and did not know what was in the declaration schedule. B. O. A barristers denied that Fed. rescue money was employed badly. “This isn’t a case in which there’s any risk or threat to TARP funds,” Lewis Liman, a counsel for the bank, informed the judge. The $33 million penalty was below the $50 million that General Electrical concluded last week to pay to settle SEC crime charges. Counsels asserted it is rare for judges to obstruct supposed SEC consent agreements, but Rakoff has done it before.

In 2003, he blocked a $500 million settlement with WorldCom over the accounting crime that led straight to the telephone company’s bankruptcy. The Merrill amalgamation has weakened Lewis, whose bank faces many lawsuits, regulatory probes, and the fury of stockholders and judiciary over the bonuses and the size of Merrill’s losses. Since April, Lewis has got fired as head honcho and over fifty percent of his long-supportive board. Shares of the bank have fallen 51% since the coalition was published last Sept. They closed Mon. up 26 cents at $16.68 on the Big Apple Stock Exchange.

BOA’s better than anticipated Q2 profit was energized by the bank’s foreign operations. In its quarterly report filed with the SEC Commission, the bank announced Mon.  it lost $255 million in the US, as losses from failed loans continued to rise. Nearly all of the bank’s revenues of $2.42 billion after preferred dividends came from East Asia, due to a $3.5 bill after-tax gain from B. O. A’s ( BAC ) sale of part of its sake in China Construction Bank. B. O. A’s non-US operations generated $3.48 bln profit, including the gain. Its East Asia operations brought in just about $3.58 bill in the quarter, while its South America and Caribbean operations made $93 million, and Canadian operations saw a $50 million profit.

Operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa lost $242 million. The results show the struggles the bank, like others, still faces as it makes an attempt to build a worldwide business. Bank of America has about 55 million consumer and small-business purchasers, making it exposed to delinquencies and defaults, yet also prepared to flourish when the economy recovers.

Bank of America claimed it recorded a $13.4 bn. provision for loan losses during the second quarter as consumers wrestled with debt among rising unemployment, compared to $5.8 billion a year back. On a three-way call with researchers last month, B. O. A Chairperson Ken Lewis asserted “profitability in the 2nd half the year will be much stronger than the 1st half,” given the lack of many one off items that were positive to revenues including the China Construction Bank stock sale. The bank has received $45 bln in rescue funds as an element of the Treasury Departments $700 billion fiscal rescue package. It is not known when it’ll pay back the govt.

Public concern has bubbled over as billions of greenbacks in bonuses have been distributed on Wall Street, the center of the 2008 money typhoon that made a contribution to the worst recession in generations and left many millions of people jobless. Even President Obama joined in, labeling the $18.4 bill in bonuses “shameful” and calling on the Street to “show some restraint.” Seizing on the populist anger, lawmakers put together a compensation-reform bill that passed the House of Delegates on July 31 and may be brought to a vote in the Senate after the summer recess. Still, regardless of all of the clear momentum building to rein in runaway pay, it seems like Wall Street’s compensation practices will largely appear unscathed. Critics say the bill’s key suggestions, though well-intentioned, are non-binding, so corporations can opt to ignore them. And Wall Street managers, seemingly disinterested about further alienating an already perturbed mob, are revving up to lift pay. Some top firms that just last year received billions in govt rescue money are prospering again and appear unfazed by the widespread feedback of large paychecks.  Flush from 2 quarters of profits and having paid back the govt its rescue money, Goldman Sachs has put aside $11.36 bill for compensation and benefits in the just first half a year of the year, a 33% increase from last year.

JPMorgan Chase, which also has repaid taxpayer money, reported record Q2 income and has chopped out $14.5 bn.  for pay in the first part of the year, up 22%. While Morgan Stanley, too, has paid back the govt, the bank recorded its third-consecutive loss in quarter 2. Regardless of that, the bank has put aside $6 bill so far this year for compensation costs, and $3.87 bn. just in quarter two, which represents 72% of its revenue.  “The the Street community isn’t especially plugged into the public sentiment,” claims Peter Cappelli, management teacher at Wharton business faculty. “It’s a culture that has not cared much about the political realities elsewhere.

Officers have put the blame on Wall Street’s pay structure for making the fiscal crisis worse. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner expounded the compensation practices “encouraged OTT risk-taking.” Lured by gigantic bonuses, increasingly large numbers of financiers took risks that led the US to the threshold and a $700 bn. state rescue for the industry. The Street banks usually put aside more for compensation than other industries about half of income to pay staff. Financiers say they should pay more to keep top talent.

In Morgan Stanley’s annual report, it asserts : “In order to draw in and keep qualified staff, we must compensate such staff at market levels. Generally those levels have caused worker compensation to be our best expense.” The banks also say that pay is firmly linked to performance and that if they do not keep qualified workers, performance may be influenced.

Studies have found that there’s little relationship between pay and performance on Wall Street, and financiers win no matter what way the market goes. On July thirty, Manhattan Attorney General Andrew Cuomo released results of a nine-month inquiry of the first nine banks that received bailouts from the governing body’s Uneasy Asset Relief Program ( TARP ). His report found that banks paid out bonuses even while running at a total loss, and at those that did post positive earnings, yearly bonuses surpassed the whole year’s profit. At Citigroup, regardless of the $27.68 bln in losses last year, the bank paid out $5.33 billion in bonuses, of which about 738 workers each received $1 million or more.

JPMorgan earned $5.6 bln in the year and paid out $8.69 bn. in bonuses.  The bank also had more seven-figure earners than any of its rivals 1,148 staff received $1 million or more.  Goldman earned $2.3 bln and paid out $4.8 bill in bonuses, with 212 workers earning $3 million or more. Cuomo asserts his research makes it clear that “there is no clear rhyme or reason to the way banks compensate and reward their workers. Compensation for bank employees has become unmoored from the banks’ financial performance.

Thru this year, there were lots of other revelations about Wall Street excesses. One example that only appeared to get uglier as more details appeared was what occurred at Merrill Lynch before and after it was compelled to sell itself to B. O. A to avoid collapse. In the final a quarter of 2008, as BofA was attempting to close the acquisition, Merrill lost $15.3 bill bringing its losses for all of 2008 to a record $27 bn.. Yet, Merrill Boss man John Thain pushed thru $3.6 bn.  in bonuses to Merrill staff days before the amalgamation with BofA closed on Jan 1, 2009. The alliance cost American taxpayers $20 bln in readies and a contract by the govt to share in losses that totaled $118 bn.

It also damaged the reputation of BofA Manager Kenneth Lewis. He had to relinquish the title of manager in Apr and since that point has faced calls to step down as Manager.  The bank is getting investigated by Cuomo and by Congress due to the Merrill bonus payments and losses that were not divulged to stockholders. Last week it paid a fine of $33 million to the SEC Commission to decide a court complaint that BofA had misled stockholders about what it knew about the bonuses.

Even as Wall St is enlarging its compensation and lawmakers are criticising it for doing so, Washington, too, looks to be shying away from imposing harsh curbs on pay. The key point is that legislators are afraid that troublesome pay curbs might get in the way of the finance services industry helping foster an industrial recovery.

“It is a nightmare situation no-one wants these firms to fail, which would lead to a larger business and political disaster ; on the other hand it’s embarrassing that they’re already deciding to pay themselves more for doing well,” asserts Alan Johnson of compensation specialist Johnson Associates.

Critics say the compensation-reform bill lacks teeth.

Bankrolled by Rep Barney Frank, D-Mass, the company and Money Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009 has provisions that can have an effect on all publicly traded corporations, and there are special provisions for monetary establishments. Rather, it demands that shareholders vote on compensation of senior operatives. That is because, as Frank notes, the quantity of compensation at banks isn’t “a public call, rather it’s up to shareholders.” the votes are non-binding, and boards of directors at the firms can decide to pay no attention to them.

One notable shareholder is asserting that it’d be most unlikely for it to be handy. The allowance fund of The United Society of Carpenters and Joiners of America has assets of $40 bn. and holds shares of 3,603 firms. Douglas McCarron, the fund’s president, asserts it might be a “challenge” to try a quantity of research and research needed to vote on the pay plans of all of the corporations in which it owns shares.

He is saying the fund might end up voting at thousands of the firms it invests in based mostly on a straightforward check list. “Such an action will enfeeble the goals that inspired the work to enhance compensation disclosure,” claims McCarron, in a letter to the SEC. Opponents of the bill say there are a lot of unanswered questions that they hope the Senate will address when it discusses the legislation. “Part of the issue is that I do not recall any expert affidavit on any of the pieces of the bill, nor have we held any hearings on compensation specifically,” Rep Scott Garrett, R-N.J, says. It is also confusing how, precisely, banks that still have TARP funds will see their compensation influenced.

The govt. has delegated Kenneth Feinberg as pay czar to observe pay at banks and automobile corporations that have not paid back govt rescue cash, and he still has to in public take any action. The Treasury has suggested that operatives at these firms get no bonuses or retention and motivation awards, and in a few cases they’d actually have to repay past bonuses.

7 corporations have till Thu. to submit suggested compensation details for the 100 highest-paid employees in the firms. While Feinberg has the power to make certain pay doesn’t reward dangerous behaviour and to even take back pay that was unjustified, it is misleading what he’s going to do with the info. “Feinberg has broad authority to be sure that compensation at those firms strikes an appropriate balance,” announces Treasury spokesman Meg Reilly. “Obviously, we all have a shared interest in guaranteeing that those corporations can return to profitability as fast as possible so that taxpayers can recoup their investment.

But neither Feinberg’s appointment nor the bill that awaits the Senate addresses the elemental problem that fueled the fury, which is that traders and operatives at these firms finish up winning all ways. As Cuomo asserted in his report, the Street compensation is an offer in which “heads I win, tails you lose. But at Goldman Sachs, “The relationship between our net income and compensation has been 99% since the firm went public in 1999,” claims speaker Lucas Wagon Praag. “This is hard evidence that pay is explicitly linked to performance. Feedback is targeted on more than the industry’s large players. An August four report from compensation experts Presidio Pay aides researched 115 banks that received TARP funds.

The report, like Cuomo’s, found no link between pay and performance at the banks in the last 3 years. “Wall Street’s commercial contentment is based on taxpayers’ money saving them from disaster, and they have already forgotten that,” asserts Stephen Lerner, who directs the financial-reform campaign at union group SEIU. “Americans lost trillions of bucks in wealth from the industrial collapse, and while Wall Street got bailed out, it’ll take years for employees on Main Street to get roles and work their way out of this industrial catastrophe.

The Planet, the world figurehead in IT hosting, today debated its results for the period finished July 31, 2009. The Planet provides quarterly updates to its purchasers, business partners and prospects with info relative to new initiatives and its progress.

“We continue seeing the most serious money expansion from both our biggest shoppers and our complicated infrastructure solutions, which include virtual and non-public racks,” recounted CEO and general manager Douglas J Erwin.

“Customer satisfaction stays at record-high levels in our call center and in our information centers. “The industrial environment is still challenging, though we have seen inspiring signs that provide buoyancy, particularly in the level of interest we have seen from new customers,” Erwin continued.

“While we are experiencing slower expansion this year, the fact is that we keep growing, and the company is financially stable and well-positioned to endure the trials of this business climate. We continue to target strategic goals and the growth of the new-product portfolio that will supply the long-term foundation for our expansion.

With the appointing of 2 senior operatives, Duke Skarda, vice chairman of IT and Software Development, and Tom Blair as VP, World Sales, we are adding heavy talent experience and DNA to our management team. “We finished quarter two with continued solid EBITDA performance in the 30%+ range, and we had a particularly strong money flow quarter,” related Chief Finance Officer Kevin Klausmeyer.

“In fact, regardless of the troublesome industrial conditions, our liquidity and capital resources are as powerful as they have ever been.  Our money flow for the first bit of the year represents the strongest performance in any half year period in our history.

Second Quarter Highlights

New Customers: The company added more than 1,000 new customers in the first quarter. New data from Netcraft reveals that The Planet now hosts 18.5 million Web sites.

Highest-Performing Storage Cloud: The company issued a new report that shows The Planet Storage Cloud outperforms similar cloud storage platforms in both read and write tests. With its benefits of on-premise storage, elastic cloud design and utility-based billing, it delivers transfer speeds that are more than three times faster than the leading competitors.

Dallas Metroplex Colocation Data Center Opens: The company hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new 106,000-square-foot data center in the north Dallas suburb of Plano. Attended by 200 people, the opening included remarks from Chairman and CEO Douglas J. Erwin and Plano City Manager Thomas H. Muehlenbeck.

London Data Center Online: For customers with European end-users, the company announced the official opening of its first international data center in London. The new facility – the company’s eighth data center – offers geographic redundancy, enhanced performance and Gigabit connectivity.

Nehalem Servers Added to Portfolio: New servers powered by Intel’s next-generation Nehalem microarchitecture processor technology were added to the company’s server line-up. Based on the Dell PowerEdge hardware platform, the new servers are packaged as the Dual Xeon 5530.

Northstar Managed Hosting Customer Videos: The company issued two new customer success videos from its Northstar portfolio: The DJ Booth (www.djbooth.net), with more than 700,000 visitors each month, provides disc jockeys, music professionals and trendsetters with a platform to hear and discuss the best in urban music and hip hop. BreakThisRecord.com (www.breakthisrecord.com) is a free challenge site that extends opportunities for anyone – from individuals, schools or even groups and clubs – to post videos, establish their own personal records and defy others to best their performance.

SpeedFC Video: The company featured a new video with colocation customer SPEED FC (www.speedfc.com). SPEED FC is a single-source provider of business-to-business and direct-to-consumer customized, integrated and outsourced transaction management services for both traditional and e-commerce retailers. With customers that include some of the most highly regarded, well-known brands in the country, the company provides a suite of end-to-end solutions, including fulfillment, customer care, and Web development, hosting and marketing.

Stratecast White Paper Underscores Hosting Value: The company issued a new white paper from market research firm Stratecast, a division of Frost & Sullivan. The data supplies conclusive evidence that The Planet’s enterprise-grade hosted IT infrastructure reduces operating costs for small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) by 51 percent over a three-year period. According to the report, hosting places increased control into the hands of SMBs, in addition to offering greater technical and business flexibility. Stratecast predicts that hosted infrastructure will become a preferred method for supporting the IT needs of these companies.

Senior IT Executive Appointment: The company announced the appointment of Duke S. Skarda as vice president, Information Technology and Software Development. Reporting to Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Douglas J. Erwin, Skarda is responsible for the company’s entire span of IT activities, including core IT operations, and software development and implementation for customer-facing solutions.

About The Planet
The Planet is the leading provider of On Demand IT Infrastructure solutions, hosting more than 20,000 small- and medium-size businesses and 18.5 million Web sites worldwide. Customers have the power to choose from the broadest range of hosting solutions in the industry, from dedicated servers, Managed Dedicated Servers, Northstar Managed Hosting and data center colocation, all backed by 24×7×365 support. With the best choice of servers, software tools and world-class service, backed by state-of-the-art data centers and an enterprise-class network, The Planet turns IT into a powerful competitive advantage that enables customers to grow their businesses. For additional information, visit www.theplanet.com.

Regulators on Fri. shut down 2 banks in Florida and one in Oregon, bringing to 72 the amount of federally insured banks to fail this year beneath the load of the feeble economy and rising loan losses.  The Fed. Deposit Insurance Co was designated receiver of the banks : First State Bank, of Sarasota, Fla. ; Venice, Fla.-based Community State Bank of Sarasota County, and Community First Bank, of Prineville, Ore. Community State Bank had $97 million in assets and $93 million in deposits. Community First Bank had $209 million in assets and $182 million in deposits. The FDIC expounded Stearns Bank, of St Cloud, Minn, agreed to presume all of the deposits of both Florida banks.

Stearns Bank also agreed to buy $451 million of First State Bank assets and $94 million of Community State Bank assets. The 9 branches of First State Bank will reopen Mon. as Stearns Bank branches, while Community Countrywide Bank’s 4 branches will reopen Sat. . Nampa, Idaho-based Home Fed Bank concluded to think all of Community First Bank’s deposits, except about $31 million in brokered deposits. Home Fed also agreed to buy about $197 million of the failed bank’s assets.

Community First Bank’s 8 branches will reopen on Mon.  as branches of Home Fed Bank. The FDIC guesses the cost to the deposit insurance fund from the failure of the 3 banks will be around $185 million. Record unemployment, sinking home prices and declining private wealth have put major inhibitions on consumers this year, making it hard for them to pay down debt. Bank mess ups have cascaded as the economy soured and loan losses exploded, sapping billions of bucks out of the deposit insurance fund. It now stands at its lowest level since 1993, $13 bn. as of the first quarter.

While losses on home mortgages could be stabilizing, delinquencies on commercial real estate loans remain a difficulty spot, particularly for regional banks that hold large amounts of the high-risk loans. The quantity of banks on the FDIC’s list of problem institutions jumped to 305 in quarter 1 the highest number since 1994 in the savings and loan crisis from 252 in the 4th quarter. The FDIC expects US bank screw ups to cost the insurance fund around $70 bn. thru 2013. The bank failure costliest to the fund came in July 2008 with the seizure of IndyMac Bank.

The insurance fund is guestimated to have lost $10.7 bln on the closure of the huge California bank. The largest US bank failure ever apropos bank assets also came last year. Seattle-based thrift Washington Mutual Inc, which had about $307 bill in assets, slid in Sep and was purchased by JPMorgan Chase & Company for $1.9 bln in a deal brokered by the FDIC.

Zion Bank is a member of S&P 500 and has a headquarters in Salt Lake City, Utah. This is a company that, as of June 30, 2008, had collected more than $54.6 billion in assets. On top of that, this is a company that actually has more than 11,000 people employed for them. So in a nut shell, this is a company that is very big, but have they always been this big?

The history of Zion Bank is a long one that actually goes all the way back to the very early days of the LDS settlement in Utah. Pretty much, Zion is able to trace its history all the way back to 1873 when it first opened. The company itself was founded by a Mr Brigham Young. Now when Zion Bank first started up, the first settlers of Utah had only been there about 26 years. Not only that, but Utah itself was still about 23 years away from statehood when this bank first came to be.

Because of the early history of Zion Bank, it is actually Utah’s very first chartered savings bank and trust company. Over the next twenty years the company would grow and prosper. In the big panic of 1893, the bank would not only remain solvent, but it was one of the few banks to actually continue to grow during this time.

During the start of the twentieths century, Zion Bank would actually go on to help finance many firms. Some of the big names of the firms that were financed by Zion Bank were Salt Lake and Los Angeles Railroad Company, Salt Lake Gas Company, and even Big Cottonwood Power Company. The only time that Zion Bank did not see growth was during the great depression of 1929. At the start of the crash Zion was in a very sound financial position. However, in 1932 customers began to run on the bank and tellers were instructed to honor all withdrawal requests.

During the first two and a half days, almost $1.5 million was withdrawn. However, a few days later many customers returned to the bank to redeposit their money. This was the biggest scare that Zion Bank had, but it was able to overcome it by putting the people first. By the time that 1957 rolled around Zion Bank merged with Utah Savings and Trust Company, as well as First national Bank of Salt Lake City. This is when the name was changed to Zion First National Bank.

In the end what you have is a company that has had way more ups than downs. However, when it was faced with a hard spot, it was able to overcome it. These are the kinds of companies that you want to entrust your money to. You do not want to give your money to people who would refuse to give it back, like many banks did during the Great Depression, and you do not want to bank with companies that fell apart during that time either. You want to bank with a bank that has been there and seen it all. You want to be with Zion Bank.

A judge for the 3rd time delayed a hearing over IRS demands for the names of 52,000 made Yankee clients of Swiss banking giant UBS on Fri. after lawyers for the US Justice Office and the bank stated that they need more time to play ball. “There are still some issues that are yet to be resolved,” Stuart Gibson, a Justice Dept tax division attorney, told US District Judge Alan Gold in Miami.  “The parties are working through these issues and plan to resume talking. Gold scheduled an August 12 phone standing conference at the request of both sides in the closely studied case which has promised to add new cracks to Switzerland’s historic name for banking privacy.

“By then we might hope to have worked thru the leftover issues, and have initialed a written agreement,” recounted Gibson.  “If the parties have not reached agreement, we might expect to be ready to report where the parties are in their discussions, or whether they’ve been unable to reach an agreement. If the two sides are unable to strike a deal, Gold claimed he would schedule a key evidentiary hearing in the case either later on this month or in mid-September.

Gibson had said to the judge on July 31 that both sides had reached “an agreement in theory on the major issues.”. The Justice Department and IRS disagree that UBS must turn over the customer info because plenty of the bank’s Yankee clients have dodged millions of greenbacks in Fed taxes with the bank’s active help.

UBS in Feb agreed to pay $780 million in a settlement that deferred prosecution of charges that it continually sent its financiers on secret visits to the US to help Yankee consumers place their assets in offshore accounts that wouldn’t be reported to the IRS.

UBS has contended that divulging the customer data would be a criminal violation of Swiss banking privacy laws.

Backing that position, the Swiss presidency has raised the chance that it might seize the customer info to stop any handover ordered by a US court. Fed. investigators have maintained force on UBS in the deadlock by chasing criminal cases against some of the approximate 250 Yank clients whose account information the bank formerly agreed to give the IRS based primarily on explicit proof of tax evasion. So far, 3 of those clients have begged to filing fake tax returns, most lately last week.

The IRS in March launched a half year program offering lower penalties to USA citizens who willingly divulge formerly secret offshore assets and agree to pay taxes on the holdings. Collusion often means no legal charges will be filed, and needs payment of back taxes and interest for no less than 6 years, and some penalties. While the IRS hasn’t revealed the precise collusion rate, the agency claimed there was a swift rise in the quantity of taxpayers making voluntary disclosures this year. The majority of the cases involve unreported income in offshore accounts, the agency claimed.